Russia ↗
Loading contour...
Total surface area17,098,246 km²ed. 2024
Population143,513,3282025
Land area16,376,870 km²2023
TypeCountry
Area source: UN Demographic Yearbook 2024, Table 3
02Act II · 1:1 studio
Which is bigger: Russia or Antarctica?
Russia is larger: 17,098,246 km² versus 14,200,000 km² (editorial estimate) for Antarctica, or about 20% more.
Both areas at the same scale: Russia and Antarctica. Drag the outlines, separate them and see what the Mercator map hides.
True-size comparison
Same scale. Real difference.
Drag the outlines to overlap them, or place them side by side.
❄️
Antarctica
Loading contour...
Total surface area14,200,000 km²editorial estimate
Population1,000editorial estimate
TypeContinent
03 · Verdict
What the map gets wrong
True area tells a different story than the Mercator map.
True area ratio1.2×Larger in reality: Russia.
Mercator: estimate at the area’s center17.5×Looks larger on a Mercator map: Antarctica.
Why does this happen?
The Mercator projection enlarges areas more and more the farther they lie from the equator. The centers of the two areas lie about 66° (Russia) and 85° (Antarctica) from the equator. An estimate based on each center’s latitude gives an area ratio of 17.5 : 1, compared with the real ratio of 1.2 : 1. This is not a measurement of the entire outlines on a Mercator map.
Tip: You can also compare these items dynamically by clicking the link below and dragging them directly across the global interactive map.
At least one value represents a continent and comes from an older editorial dataset. Treat the result as an approximation. The overlay uses an equal-area projection. Coastal outlines are simplified and do not include all waters counted in the statistics. Their area ratio can therefore differ from the ratio of official total areas. Geometry: Natural Earth, public domain. Read the methodology ↗
Why do Russia and Antarctica look different on a Mercator map than in reality?
The Mercator projection preserves angles, which makes it useful for navigation, but it enlarges areas more and more the farther they lie from the equator. At 60° latitude, areas already appear four times larger than at the equator. A same-scale comparison like the one on this page greatly reduces that distortion.